Urban Environmental Management:
A Framework for Policy and Practice
Take any of today's environmental problems faced by the inhabitants of Earth, and its causes and pressures can easily be traced back, directly or indirectly, to urban areas. The forces and processes that constitute 'urban activity' have far-reaching and long-term effects not only on its immediate boundaries, but also on the entire region in which it is positioned.

In a very broad sense, the urban environment consists of resources, human and other; processes, that convert these resources into various other useable products and services; and effects of these processes, which may be negative or positive.

Resources
Processes
Effects
  • Human Resources
  • Sunlight
  • Land
  • Water
  • Minerals
  • Electricity
  • Fuels
  • Finance
  • Intermediary products
  • Recyclable materials
  • Manufacture
  • Transportation
  • Construction
  • Migration
  • Population Growth
  • Residence/Living
  • Community Services
    (Education, Health ... )
  • Negative Effects - Pollution - air, water, noise Waste Generation - garbage, sewage Congestion, overcrowding
  • Positive Effects Products, Value-addition, Increased knowledgebase/ education, Access to better services

With the inevitable danger of overlap and generalization, GDRC identifies three dimensions in urban environments:

  • Natural Environments
    Resources, processes and effects related to flora and funa, human beings, minerals, water, land, air, etc.

  • Built Environments
    Resources, processes and effects related to buildings, housing, roads, railways, electricity, water supply, gas etc.

  • Socio-economic Environments
    Resources, processes and effects related to human activities, education, health, arts and culture, economic and business activities, heritage - urban lifestyles in general.

It is the intersection and overlay of these three dimensions that constitutes an 'urban environment'. Taking any one dimension at the exclusion of the other two poses the inevitable danger of missing the forest for the trees - the interdependency and interdisciplinarity of the three dimensions have to be fully understood in the development of coherent and sustainable policies and programmes for the urban environment.

This is particularly true with the multiplicity of actors and activities - there has been a growing realization that state agencies and activities are, but one part of a spectrum of agencies and activities that are involved in the urban environment.


Understanding the Scale of Urban Environmental Problems


A key to effective policy formulation and allocation of resources to project components is the understanding of the scale of urban environmental problems. This understanding will help us in a variety of ways: collect data and information at the appripriate level, identify resources and stakeholders that function and are involved in the particular scale, formulate policy and take appropriate action at the appropriate level.

At each spatial scale, the characteristic problems and the related infrastructure and services needed to address such problems are specified. The consideration of the spatial scale of impacts reveals several important issues for developing countries:

  • health impacts are greater and more immediate at the household or community level and tend to diminish in intensity as the spatial scale increases;
  • equity issues arise in relation to (a) the provision of basic services at the household or community scale and (b) intertemporal externalities at the regional and global scale - particularly the intergenerational impacts implicit in non-sustainable resource use and global environmental issues; and
  • levels of responsibility and decision making should correspond to the scale of impact, but existing jurisdictional arrangements often violate this principle.

Water pollution
Loss of habitat, biodiversity and species dedangered
Region/Nation
Soil erosion and increased salinity
Toxic run-off and acid rain
Amenity loss
Traffic congestion
City
Loss of heritage and historical buildings
Reduced property and building values
Accidents and disasters
Polluted land
Community
inappropriate and inadequate technology use
Trash dumping
Household
household health, garbage generation, air/water/noise pollution, spread of diseases
Lack of understanding of environmental problems
Flooding
Noise pollution
Natural disasters
Inadequate tax/financial revenues
Flooding and surface drainage
Lack of, and inappropriate, laws and legislation
Toxic and hazardous wastes/dumps
High living densities
Loss of agricultural land and desertification
Air pollution
Water pollution
Inadequate supply and transmission loss of electricity
Misguided urban governments and management practices
Natural and man-made hazards and disasters
Land clearance and loss of forest cover
Effects of climate change and global warming.

Urban Environmental Issues: Air

Problem area
Effects
Causes
Management options
AIR-RELATED PROBLEMS
AMBIENT AIR POLLUTION
  • health problems
  • economic costs from health care costs and productivity losses
  • amenity losses (aesthetic, cultural, and recreational)
  • industrialization
  • increase in motorized fleet and congestion
  • use of highly polluting fuels (leaded gas and high sulphur coal)
  • energy pricing policies
  • topography and climate
  • fuel pricing
  • regulations, standards, emissions charges
  • demand management
  • transport planning
  • appropriate technology (clean fuels, scribbers, etc.)
INDOOR AIR POLLUTION
  • health problems (chronic obstructed lung disease, acute respiratory infections, low birth weights, cancer)
  • economic costs from health care and productivity losses
  • use of low-quality fuels for cooking and heating (biomass and high sulphur coal)
  • poorly ventilated dwellings and workplaces
  • passive smoking
  • cottage industry activities
  • substitute fuel and equipment pricing
  • fuel switching
  • building codes
  • public education
  • tax hazardous products and processes

Urban Environmental Issues: Water

Problem area
Effects
Causes
Management options
WATER-RELATED PROBLEMS
SURFACE WATER POLLUTION
  • health problems
  • Economic costs (additional treatment, new sources of supply, health costs)
  • amenity losses
  • pricing policies
  • unclear property rights
  • poor regulations and/or enforcement
  • municipal and industrial waste disposal practices
  • urban runoff
  • irrigation practices
  • marginal cost pricing
  • regulations, standards, licensing, charges
  • improve monitoring and enforcement
  • demand management and waste water reuse
  • appropriate technology
  • land use controls
  • waste management
GROUNDWATER POLLUTION DEPLETION
  • reduced water quality from saline intrusion, biochemical seepage
  • health impacts
  • economic costs
  • pricing policies
  • unclear property rights
  • poor regulations and/or enforcement
  • unsustainable extraction
  • sanitation, municipal and industrial waste disposal practices
  • poor demand management
  • marginal cost procong
  • regulation, standards, licensing, charges
  • waste management
  • appropriate technology
  • demand management
  • controls on land use and sources of information
COASTAL/LAKE POLLUTION
  • health effects due to contaminated seafood and direct contact
  • loss of recreational resources and tourism revenues
  • damage to fisheries
  • amenity losses
  • eutrophication
  • unclear property rights
  • poor regulations and/or enforcement
  • municipal and industrial waste disposal practices
  • disposal of shipboard wastes
  • regulations, standards, licensing charges
  • appropriate technology
  • coastal zone management and preservation
  • shipping facilities
  • waste management
  • land use control

Urban Environmental Issues: Land

Problem area
Effects
Causes
Management options
LAND-RELATED PROBLEMS
DEGRADATION OF LAND
  • declining agricultural productivity
  • reduced renewable resource base (deforestation, lost soil fertility)
  • erosion and siltation
  • amenity losses
  • loss of natural habitat and species
  • changes in relative value of land uses
  • uncontrolled urban growth
  • unclear property rights
  • woodfuel and land pricing
  • mining and quarrying activities
  • land disposal of municipal and industrial wastes
  • internalize ecological value in land prices
  • designate special areas for management
  • local participation
  • clarify property rights
  • economic resource pricing
  • land use controls
LOSS OF CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL PROPERTY
  • loss of heritage
  • loss of tourism revenues
  • damage to culturally values buildings, monuments, natural sites.
  • land prices do not reflect social valuation
  • lack of regulation and/or enforcement
  • air pollution
  • SWM practices
  • land subsidence and poor drainage
  • internalize costs of loss in redevelopment planning
  • tax incentives for preservation
  • zone and building codes
  • pollution control
  • public education
DEGRADATION OF ECOSYSTEMS
  • health hazards
  • resettlement costs
  • loss of habitat and species
  • air, water, land pollution
  • failure to anticipate effects in planning and development
  • pricing policies
  • lack of rural political power
  • internalize costs of rural degradation
  • resource pricing
  • clarify property rights

Urban Environmental Issues: Cross-Media

Problem area
Effects
Causes
Management options
CROSS-MEDIA PROBLEMS
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTES
  • household
  • costs related to blocked drainage and flooding
  • water pollution from leachates
  • air pollution from burning
  • amenity losses
  • poor management (improper collection and disposal, little resource recovery)
  • pricing (no cost recovery)
  • disposal impacts external to the community
  • input pricing
  • private sector delivery of collection and disposal
  • waste minimization (recycling, recovery, source reduction)
  • regulations, standards, licensing, charges
  • expanded coverage
  • institutional strengthening
HAZARDOUS WASTES
  • surface, ground, coastal water contamination
  • related health, economic and resource impacts
  • accumulation of toxics in the food chain
  • reduced property values
  • inadequate regulations and/or enforcement
  • no incentives for treatment
  • input pricing for waste-producing industries
  • low visibility, nonlinear, long term effects
  • dispersed small-scale and cottage industries
  • regulations, standards, licensing and standards
  • improve monitoring and enforcement
  • treatment and disposal incentives
  • economic input pricing
  • waste minimization
  • marginal cost pricing
  • special incentives for small scale generators
  • privatization of treatment and disposal operations
NATURAL AND MAN-MADE HAZARDS
  • health effects (death, injuries)
  • economic costs (loss of lives, property, infrastructure)
  • land degradation (flooding, landslides, earthquakes)
  • amenity losses
  • natural forces
  • land market failures (lack of alternatives for squatters, artificially constrained supply)
  • land policies (no taxation, no/unenforced protection of high risk lands)
  • poor construction practices
  • reduce constraints on supply of usable land
  • appropriate incentives (prices, taxes, tenure, housing finance)
  • land use controls
  • improve knowledge about risks and alternatives
INADEQUATE SANITATION
  • health impacts (diarrhoeal diseases, parasites, high infant mortality, malnutrition)
  • related economic costs
  • eutrophication
  • amenity losses
  • inappropriate technology
  • pricing (no cost recovery)
  • poor management (lack of operations and maintenance, uncoordinated investments)
  • inadequate hygiene education
  • gear sanitation options to willingness to pay
  • community approaches
  • cost recovery (pay for O&M, new investments)
  • hygiene education
INADEQUATE DRAINAGE
  • health effects
  • property damage
  • accidents
  • reduced urban productivity (shutdown of business, transport systems)
  • inadequate hygiene education
  • increased urban runoff due to impermeabilization and upstream deforestation
  • occupation of low-lying lands
  • community management of maintenance
  • strategic investment in drainage
  • land use controls and market liberalization
  • solid waste management

A proppsal for an Urban Environmental Management
Framework for Policy and Practice


In order to develop an effective response to the myrid range of challenges facing urban environments today, GDRC has developed a framework to tackle these and related issues in the formulation of policy and practice of urban environmental management. The framework has also largely guided the development of this website. The basic aim of this framework is three-fold:
  • to develop awareness and educate on issues related to urban environments;
  • to assist in policy and programme development; and
  • to facilitate monitoring and evaluation.
The target audience of this framework is kept broad to increase its utility value - government agencies, planners and planning bodies, NGOs, donor agencies, community groups, academics etc.

The framework is presented as a series of statements. Each statement is briefly explained and is supported by resources available on the UEM Homepage.

    URBAN ENVIRONMENTS
    Urban Environments pose a challenge for effective distribution and management of global resources

    As illustrated in the Numbers section, the density and population of today's cities necessitates the equitable distribution of resources that are needed for its various activities. It is therefore necessary to understand the effects of an urban area not only within its immediate boundaries, but also on the region and country it is positioned, due to the large amount of resources necessary to sustain it.

    BALANCING ACTS
    There is a need to strike a balance between natural and built environments and between ecological and economic objectives.

    Agglomeration and centrality of resources and skills that an urban area offers should not be ignored, but should be balanced with the natural environment, including air, water, land, and mineral resources. Economic objectives in job creation, income generation and distribution,particularly for developing countries, will have to be tempered with ecological objectives of sustainable living. The priority that developing cities place on economic development and income distribution over that of environmental issues has to be understood from the larger perspective of long-term human development.

    VISIONING
    There is a need to develop a structure of goals/visions and a methodology to achieve it in order to identify the action that has to be taken

    A structure of goals and visions for sustainable urban living, that can easily be understood by ordinary citizens should be developed. This will allow communities and governments to discuss ways in which this can be achieved. It also attributes legitimacy and currency for the problems faced in urban environmental management, and sets the platform on which these problems can be addressed. The scale of UEM problems should be understood, so that appropriate action can be taken at the appropriate level.

    ACTION PLANS
    Steps need to be taken that are relevant in the short term in order to gain wider acceptability, keeping long term goals in mind

    In relation to the previous point, the goals and visions have to be divided into immediate, intermediate and eventual goals, so that the issues are better understood, and tangible/visible results can be achieved. Sharing and cooperating on essential lessons, practices and technologies is critical to achieving such goals.

    INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
    Access, sharing and dissemination of information has to be a priority to achieve greater understanding of the issues involved

    The cause-and-effect reasoning of local actions has to be understood from a regional and global perspective. For example, what is the effect of drinking a cup of coffee on coffee growers in South America? Key to achieving this understanding and exploration is information, and its easy, adequate and immediate access. Timely and packaged Information is key to influence local decision-making processes, which on a cumulative basis, have global repercussions.

    KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER
    Collaborative efforts in 'knowledge transfer' at the city-to-city level has to be encouraged, particularly between developed and developing cities

    Collaboration with institutions and governments in developed and developing countries for the transfer of urban 'software' (Inspiring ideas and best practices, innovative technologies, practical solutions, etc.) has to be encouraged - covering among other issues, policies, programmes, skills, local and city governance. Feasibility and transferability of such software will have to be studied in depth before collaborative projects are launched.

    SUSTAINABILITY
    There is a need to understand and enact the concept of sustainable development and sustainable living, in all its varied definitions

    Wider participation to achieve the goals of sustainable development and living has to be encouraged. This has to involve the community, local governments, and the whole range of non-governmental organizations (including the private sector). Sustainable living should become a way of life, rather than a fancy concept that is espoused by a 'enlightened' few.

    TECHNOLOGY
    Development of new technologies that are clean, green, and practical has to be encouraged and exchanged between local and city governments to combat environmental problems

    Consequences of current polluting technologies has to be weighed in terms of their effect on the environment, while transfer of environmental technologies has to be enabled through a variety of governmental and non-governmental forums, including those online.


References:
  • Bartone, Carl, "Annotated Outline of a Report on Strategic Options for Managing the Urban Environment" Washington DC: World Bank, 1991.
  • Lee, Yok-shiu, "Myths of Environmental Management and the Urban Poor" in Mega-City Growth and the Future. Tokyo: United Nations University, 1994
  • Leitman, Josef, Rapid Urban Environmental Assessment. Volume I: Methodology and Preliminary Findings.. UMP Discussion Paper 14. Washington DC: World Bank
Return to the UEM Programme