10 Myths about the Informal Sector: Challenging Misconceptions for Smarter Policies
Hari Srinivas
Concept Note Series E-214
Abstract
The informal sector is a major contributor to employment and economic activity in developing countries, yet it is often misunderstood and stigmatized. This document debunks 10 common myths about the informal economy, challenging misconceptions related to legality, efficiency, taxation, environmental impact, and its role in national development. Through real-world examples, it highlights the sector's adaptability, contributions to sustainability, and linkages with the formal economy. Recognizing and integrating the informal sector into policy discussions can lead to more inclusive and effective economic strategies that support livelihoods and sustainable urban development.
The informal sector plays a vital role in the economies of developing countries, providing livelihoods for millions of people who might otherwise remain unemployed. Yet, it is often misunderstood and stigmatized due to widespread misconceptions. Many policy-makers view informal businesses as obstacles to economic growth, rather than recognizing their contributions to employment, innovation, and local economies.
The persistence of myths surrounding the informal sector reflects broader gaps in data, policy understanding, and public perception. Too often, informal workers are seen through a narrow lens of illegality, inefficiency, or nuisance, rather than as essential economic actors responding to structural constraints and market realities.
These misconceptions can lead to punitive policies that marginalize informal workers further, rather than empowering them through supportive interventions. By examining and correcting these myths, we can begin to shift the narrative from exclusion to inclusion and build a more comprehensive understanding of how the informal sector contributes to sustainable development.
This document aims to challenge 10 common myths about the informal sector, highlighting its complexities and demonstrating why a more supportive approach is necessary. By debunking these misconceptions, we can pave the way for policies that integrate and empower informal workers rather than marginalizing them.
1
MYTH
"It is Illegal"
A common myth of the informal sector is to simply categorize it as "illegal." Government agencies and regulatory bodies often equate informality with criminality, assuming that all unregistered enterprises are deliberately evading laws and engaging in illicit activity.
Reality: The informal sector is not necessarily illegal. While some informal activities may operate outside formal regulations, many involve legitimate work such as street vending, home-based businesses, and casual labor. The main distinction is that these businesses are unregistered or lack formal recognition, not that they are unlawful. In fact, many workers in the informal sector contribute to economic activity in ways that complement the formal sector.
2
MYTH
"It exploits poor people"
Informal sector activities are viewed as exploiting poor people and increasing the vicious cycle of poverty. Development planners and NGOs sometimes portray informal work as inherently exploitative, suggesting it traps workers?especially women and youth?in low-paid, insecure jobs without pathways to progress.
Reality: The informal sector provides employment opportunities for those who might otherwise be excluded from the formal economy, such as women, migrants, and unskilled workers. While incomes can be low and working conditions precarious, for many, informal work is a critical means of survival and economic mobility. Proper policy interventions can improve conditions and help workers transition into more secure livelihoods.
3
MYTH
"It is inefficient and promotes underachievement"
Informal sector activities are broadbrushed as being inefficient and promoting underachievement. Some policy analysts and economists argue that informal enterprises lack scale, structure, and productivity, and therefore undermine national economic performance and innovation potential.
Reality: The informal sector is often highly adaptive and resource-efficient. Many small-scale enterprises in the informal sector operate with minimal resources and use innovative approaches to meet local market demands. Rather than being inherently inefficient, they often demonstrate resilience and entrepreneurial spirit. Policies should focus on supporting and integrating informal businesses rather than dismissing them as unproductive.
4
MYTH
"It does not pay any taxes or utility fees"
It is usually pointed out that the informal sector does not pay any taxes or utility fees.
Local governments and tax authorities often complain that informal businesses operate without contributing to public revenue, portraying them as freeloaders who benefit from infrastructure without paying for it.
Reality: Informal workers and businesses do contribute to public revenues, albeit in indirect ways. Many pay local fees, market stall rentals, and informal taxes to local authorities or intermediaries. Moreover, they pay consumption taxes (such as VAT) on goods and services they purchase. While they may not be directly taxed through formal income tax systems, their economic contributions should not be ignored.
5
MYTH
"It is disconnected from the formal economy"
Many tend to point to a myth that the informal sector is disconnected from the formal economy. Business associations and formal sector advocates often argue that informal operations exist in isolation, with no meaningful integration into regulated supply chains or legal commerce.
Reality: The informal and formal economies are deeply interlinked. Many formal businesses rely on informal suppliers, distributors, and labor. For example, street vendors often sell products sourced from formal manufacturers, and large firms outsource work to home-based informal producers. Rather than existing in isolation, the informal sector plays a crucial role in value chains and economic ecosystems.
6
MYTH
"It generates pollution and toxic/hazardous wastes"
The informal sector is sometimes accused of generating pollution and toxic/hazardous wastes.
Environmental agencies and urban planners frequently associate informal activity - particularly in recycling, small manufacturing, and street vending - with unmanaged waste and ecological degradation.
Reality: While some informal activities (such as unregulated waste recycling or artisanal mining) may have environmental impacts, many informal businesses have low ecological footprints. In fact, many contribute positively to sustainability, such as informal waste pickers who recycle materials that would otherwise end up in landfills. Environmental issues in the informal sector stem from a lack of access to cleaner technologies and regulatory support rather than inherent irresponsibility.
7
MYTH
"It facilitates criminal activity"
The sector's inherent informality is usually associated with criminal activity.
Security forces and some policymakers lump informal workers together with illicit actors, reinforcing a narrative that unregulated spaces are breeding grounds for crime, trafficking, or corruption.
Reality: The informal sector should not be conflated with illegal or criminal enterprises. While a small fraction of informal businesses may engage in illicit activities, the majority involve legal economic transactions that are simply unregistered. Sweeping generalizations that link informality with crime can lead to harmful policies that penalize rather than support informal workers.
8
MYTH
"It uses public and private land illegally"
In attempting to "irradicate" informal activity, governments point to enterprises in the sector squatting on public and private land illegally. Urban authorities and property developers often argue that informal vendors and settlements occupy land without authorization, disrupting urban plans and violating property rights.
Reality: Informal workers and businesses often operate in public spaces due to a lack of affordable infrastructure, not out of deliberate lawbreaking. Many informal vendors and settlements develop through necessity rather than choice. A more productive policy approach would be to provide designated areas, improve urban planning, and recognize the economic contributions of informal land use rather than treating it purely as a legal violation.
9
MYTH
"It does not help the national economy"
It is normally assumed that the informal sector does not contribute to the national economy.
Economic planners frequently downplay the sector's role in GDP or national statistics, assuming that because informal activities are unrecorded, they are economically insignificant or counterproductive.
Reality: The informal sector is a significant contributor to national economies, especially in developing countries. It provides jobs, supports livelihoods, and meets essential consumer needs. In some countries, the informal sector accounts for over half of total employment and contributes substantially to GDP. Recognizing and supporting informal work can strengthen economic resilience and stability.
10
MYTH
"It frustrates the efforts of local governments towards urban development"
Local governments tend to be frustrated with their efforts towards urban development when it comes to areas used by the informal sector.
City administrators often see informal businesses and settlements as barriers to modernization, viewing them as chaotic elements that obstruct infrastructure projects, zoning regulations, and aesthetic goals.
Reality: Informal economies emerge in response to gaps in urban planning and economic policies. Rather than being an obstacle to development, they highlight the need for inclusive urban policies that accommodate diverse economic activities. Many cities have successfully integrated informal workers into their planning processes by recognizing them as stakeholders and creating supportive policies rather than restrictive ones.
Rethinking Informality
The informal sector is not a burden - it is an integral part of economic and social systems in developing countries. While challenges exist, dismissing informal businesses as illegal, inefficient, or harmful overlooks their contributions to employment, entrepreneurship, and even sustainability.
Rethinking informality requires a shift in mindset: from viewing it as a problem to be eliminated, to recognizing it as a dynamic and adaptive response to economic exclusion, regulatory gaps, and urban pressures. Informal workers and enterprises are innovators, service providers, and safety nets for vulnerable populations, especially where the formal economy fails to provide sufficient opportunities.
Instead of trying to eliminate the informal sector, governments and policymakers should seek ways to formalize and support its positive aspects while addressing legitimate concerns. This includes simplifying registration processes, extending social protection, ensuring safe working conditions, and offering access to finance, infrastructure, and training. Inclusion must replace penalization as the guiding principle of policy.
By understanding and embracing the realities of informal work, we can develop inclusive economic strategies that promote sustainable development, social equity, and long-term economic resilience. Supporting the informal sector is not just a moral imperative?it is also a smart economic strategy that builds more robust and equitable societies.
This work by GDRC is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this piece of work for your own purposes, as long as it is appropriately cited.
More info: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
on
