1.2 Involvement of Stakeholders
Most cities have found that successful environmental planning and management requires understanding, agreement, and coordinated action by the full range of public and private and popular sector interests and groups and organizations ("stakeholders") at the individual, neighbourhood, community, city and regional levels. It seems to be vital, therefore, that a wide-ranging process of identifying and involving "stakeholders" be undertaken, to identify and involve:
those whose interests are affected by environmental and/or development issues - or by environmental management strategies and actions;
those who control relevant implementation instruments and powers to significantly influence environment/developmental interactions; and
those who possess relevant information and expertise needed for strategy formulation and implementation.
It is important for this process to also involve groups which may be outside the formal planning and management systems, esp[especially "stakeholders" representing low-income and private sector groups and interests, at both city and neighbourhood levels.
BAMAKO: As part of the EPM exercise, a partnership was formed between the city administration and a set of key NGOs, CBOs and informal sector groups within one of the city's administrative districts. It is called "Co-ordination for Sanitation" and has been critical in moving the EPM process forward.
KATOWICE: While urban environmental working groups initially consisted only of municipal representatives, other stakeholders were consciously brought into the process. Mini-consultations were held to expand the membership of the working groups. This process also lead to the expansion of the working groups from two to six in number as well as further clarification of priority land and water-related issues.
MADRAS: An NGO movement, Exnora International, was successful in improving solid waste collection and street cleaning through community participation by involving three key stakeholders: the residents themselves, ragpickers in the informal sector (renamed street beautifiers) and the municipal authorities.
NAIROBI: Nairobi's 1993 workshop on "City Environment and Sustainable Development" was part of a larger forum that was the city's first experience with stakeholder involvement to develop a broad vision of the future. The process has led to the recommendation that a stakeholder City Environment and Sustainable Development Network be created to negotiate an action agenda on the environment with officials.
1.3 Setting of Priorities
Clearly, no city can realistically expect to successfully tackle all of its environmental and development issues at once. Accordingly, experience has shown the value of being selective and establishing an agreed process for setting priorities, so that attention and action may be focused on a limited array of problems and tasks in a strategic sequence. It may be appropriate to look at priority natural resources issues and priority environmental hazard issues in parallel. Once local environmental issue
s h
ave been identified and key stakeholders are committed to participate in the process, it is possible to work out with them which issues should receive priority attention. The criteria for prioritization will be worked out through the participatory process and will normally derive from consideration both of the impacts associated with each environmental problem and of the local capacities to respond. Appropriate criteria have included the following:
the magnitude of health impacts associated with the problem;
the size of urban productivity loss caused by the problem;
the potential for local capacity-building;
the potential for local resource mobilization;
the relative impact of the problem borne by the urban poor;
the degree to which the consequences are short- or long-term;
whether or not the problem leads to an irreversible outcome;
to respond to special circumstances (e.g. a natural disaster, or perhaps a major investment opportunity, or a social/political opening);
the degree of social/political consensus on the nature or severity of problems;
whether the problem is significantly affected by local responses and actions; and
short-run limitations posed by existing institutional and other resources.
ACCRA: In mid-1995, a week-long city consultation succeeded in bringing together over 150 stakeholders to agree on priority issues for action plan development. Two issues were identified as most critical: degradation of the Korle Lagoon and inadequate sanitation.
ABIDJAN: A stakeholder consultation was used to elaborate on four priority themes: water and wastes; housing and community infrastructure; transport and energy; and green/open space. Working groups identified and structured key problems within these priority themes.
COLOMBO: A stakeholder steering committee and a technical working group worked together with local consultants to describe the extent of environmental degradation, project future environmental conditions in Colombo, describe the lack of existing remedial measures, and compile an inventory and analysis of environmental legislation and institutional arrangements. During this process, the following environmental priorities were identified: a) loss of natural resources; b) deteriorating qua
lity of surface and
groundwater; c) flooding and stagnation of water courses; d) pollution from solid wastes; e) deteriorating ambient air quality; f) concentrated environmental problems in low-income areas; and g) traffic congestion. These problems were attributed to inadequately planned or controlled urban and industrial growth, lack of pollution control, insufficient or malfunction infrastructure and public services, and inadequate institutional and financial capacity for management.
CONCEPCION: During a four month period, sectoral meetings with stakeholders were held. Two issues emerged as priorities from this process: deficiencies in (a) water resource management and (b) urban land planning and management. These then formed the core of an initial consultation held in mid-1994.
DAKAR: At a consultative workshop, working groups identified general or thematic priorities (natural and industrial risks, air pollution, solid waste, sanitation, and environmental education) and geographically specific ones (pollution of Hann Bay and coastal erosion). At the workshop's final plenary, a consensus was reached to proceed with action planning on the Bay pollution and industrial risks.
HANOI: The Hanoi Environment Committee used the following criteria to prioritise an implementation timetable: a) health effects; b) magnitude of damage costs; and c) severity of the problem (extent and long-term versus short-term impact).