Although the vast majority of technical and financial resources for environmental planning and management will come from local sources, external aid and technical know-how can play a valuable supporting role. Thus, it is important for cities to work out appropriate roles for external assistance, to most effectively link a city's EPM process with the relevant external institutions and their activities. One key strategy here is to focus limited external resources within a framework of complementary acti
vities, so that they are complementary to (not substitutes for) local efforts and thus help to achieve the greatest impact on local problems.
CONCEPCION: The initial existence of external support was important: it provided a sound financial base in the initial phase; it constituted a show of confidence to local public and private institutions; and external ties facilitated the development of future technical and financial assistance.
HANOI: External support was important for various aspects of the city’s EPM experience: research; action plan development (for water supply, waste management, drainage and sewerage); and capacity building.
SHENYANG: The city was financially constrained in its ability to deal with environmental problems for a long time. However, since the late 1980s, foreign assistance has been used to implement environmental activities. Multilateral loans and bilateral aid have helped to upgrade the transportation system, expand water supply capacity and implement industrial pollution control. Currently, for example, an environmental information centre and environmental training centre are under construction wit
h support of an ongoing World Bank project.
THE ROLE AND USE OF EXTERNAL SUPPORT IN EIGHT CITIES: In eight of the thirteen African city case studies external support was used to facilitate the EPM process: Abidjan (UMP, World Bank); Accra (SCP, UMP, various Canadian donors); Cotonou (CREPA); Dakar (SCP, UMP); Dar es Salaam (SCP, various donors for implementation); Ibadan (SCP); Kenya Small Towns (Dutch aid); Nairobi (Friedrich Naumann Foundation); and Ouagadougou (World Bank). Without this support, the EPM process in each of these citie
s would either not have started or not have advanced as far as it has. However, the following lessons have been learned about external support:
Excessive reliance on donor support can make the EPM exercise unsustainable. Local sources of finance should be fully utilized (Dar es Salaam) and institutionalization should be accelerated (Dakar)
Thus, there is a need for the support organization or donor to gradually withdraw from the EPM process for it to achieve sustainability (Cotonou)
However, the attempt to rely solely on local resources and voluntary implementation has its limits. External financing is often raised as an issue by towns and seen as a prerequisite for implementation of priority actions (Kenya Small Towns)
Local counterpart support lined to external support did not materialize, further slowing initiation of the EPM process. These small but important logistics included housing of the chief technical advisor, transportation, communications equipment, qualified staff, office space, and an operational budget (Ibadan).